Letter to the editor: Pa. crime victims need Marsy’s Law | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Pa. crime victims need Marsy’s Law

People who fall victim to crime find themselves in a confusing and stressful judicial process while also trying to recover from physical and emotional trauma. In Pennsylvania, survivors have a strong system of laws to protect them, but they currently have no recourse if their rights are overlooked or ignored. Marsy’s Law would put the weight of the state Constitution behind those protections (“Pa. voters will decide constitutional amendment on rights of crime victims,” Oct. 1, TribLIVE).

Over the past two years, state legislators on both sides of the aisle have supported Marsy’s Law, with both the Senate and House of Representatives approving the measure. It is now qualified to appear as a ballot referendum this fall.

Marsy’s Law would allow those whose lives have been forever altered by crime to have a guaranteed voice in the process. It ensures that victims and their families have the right to be heard, be present and be informed.

This November, Pennsylvania voters will have the opportunity to take a stand for crime victims by voting in favor of the Crime Victim Rights Amendment, showing that survivors deserve our support and the protection of the state Constitution.

Elaine Gowaty

Murrysville

The writer is president of Westmoreland Federated Republican Women and former chairwoman of the Westmoreland County Republican Committee.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.