Letter to the editor: Pedestrian fears in Unity | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Pedestrian fears in Unity

I’m wondering why a 76-year-old man who has lived in Unity Township all his life pays taxes.

I have lived in Edgewater Terrace for 29 years. I have complained for years, to no avail, about cars going through stop signs and speeding, since my house is in the middle of two stop signs, one in front of my mailbox. Why should I have to worry about getting hit when I just want to get my mail? Some people use Kingston Street to see how fast they can go, and make sure they have the loudest mufflers so everybody can hear them coming.

I called the Pennsylvania State Police and township supervisors, and all I was told was the things they can’t do. Why not install a camera to catch speeders and people going through stop signs? The fines would help the county, and maybe people would start obeying the law.

But it gets better. For a year, water has been running down the street and stays in front of my mailbox. The drain that could stop the water is usually full of leaves. Why should I have to put on boots to get my mail? I have talked to the supervisors many times, and was told it would be taken care of. So far, all that was done was chalk marks in front of my driveway.

Thank you all at the Unity Township office for doing nothing. Again, I say, why do I pay taxes?

Phil Moximchalk


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.