Letter to the editor: Pharmacists good resource for vaccine information | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Pharmacists good resource for vaccine information

As you point out in your recent editorial, “Vaccination info should be epidemic” (Aug. 24, TribLIVE), the safety of life-saving vaccines is backed by science, and it is essential that the public receives accurate information about the value of receiving immunizations.

Each year, an estimated 40,000 to 50,000 U.S. adults die, and hundreds of thousands of others become sick or hospitalized, from vaccine-preventable diseases. Unfortunately, we continue to see a rise in the number of people refusing to immunize themselves and their children due to misinformation about the safety of vaccines.

As experts trained in how medications interact with the body, pharmacists are in a unique position to counsel people on the safety and efficacy of immunizations. Currently, all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico allow for pharmacist-provided immunizations in some capacity. In many areas, pharmacists are also one of the most accessible health care providers for vaccinations, with 90% of the U.S. population living within five miles of a pharmacist.

Anyone who has questions about vaccines should consult a pharmacist to learn more about the facts and importance of immunizations for a healthier life.

Lucinda L. Maine

Arlington, Va.

The writers is executive vice president and CEO of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.