Letter to the editor: Pipelines are critical | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Pipelines are critical

Natural gas and oil continue to play an increasingly important role every day in the U.S. New data reveals natural gas use in the U.S. hit a record high in 2018, largely due to its role in producing more than 30% of the country’s electricity. On the other hand, crude oil production is responsible for fueling our vehicles and air travel, as well as producing a number of other modern necessities.

Despite these factors, anti-pipeline protesters across the country have opposed the permitted construction of energy infrastructure projects.

Here in Pennsylvania, misinformation has continued to spread regarding the Mariner East Pipeline system. Environmental activists have used local connections to challenge the permitted project, including launching investigations and promoting tribal politics. One activist even took matters into her own hands last summer when she started fires and spread spoiled food near construction sites.

Local news outlets also incorrectly reported the pipeline’s construction “may jeopardize” an Exton softball league’s spring season — despite the developer’s commitment to adjusting the project’s work schedule to specifically avoid interfering with its season.

It’s time to focus on the facts: A strong energy industry is key to a strong economy. Pipelines are the safest, most efficient method of transporting oil and gas products — and Mariner East is no different. Pennsylvania’s policymakers, stakeholders, and community members must come together and prioritize investment in our critical energy infrastructure starting with Mariner East.

Craig Stevens

Washington, D.C.

The writer is spokesman for Grow America’s Infrastructure Now (gainnow.org).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.