Letter to the editor: Pittsburgh’s air must be improved | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Pittsburgh’s air must be improved

Pittsburgh’s air

As someone who just moved to Pittsburgh, I was shocked to discover the gruesome facts surrounding air quality. One out of every three days has unhealthy air quality. The area has become unhealthy to live in.

You, your family and your neighbors can play a role in paving the path toward clean air by making sure we have clean-air champions in local government.

In the last year, Dr. Karen Hacker, who recently resigned as director of the Allegheny County Health Department, worked hard to address one of the largest air polluters — U.S. Steel — leading to a record fine that is holding the company accountable for its actions and violations.

This position is now open and ready to host someone who will continue to work with the community in order to improve the air and living quality of the Pittsburgh region.

Pittsburgh has so many wonderful things to offer its current and future citizens; however, people are going to take their education and children elsewhere if and when they learn the shocking air-quality details that I did.

Rena Fennell

Cranberry Township

The writer is a junior at Duquesne University studying political and environmental science and communications.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.