ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Pope’s words on sex abuse misinterpreted |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Pope’s words on sex abuse misinterpreted

After reading the editorial “Pope lowers sex abuse expectations” (Jan. 29, TribLIVE), I am left somewhat disillusioned by the writer’s interpretation of the Pope Francis’ words. While I agree that sexual abuse is a major problem in the Catholic Church and powerful action must be taken, the “inflated expectations” the pope discusses are taken out of context. 

He is not “lowering” expectations; he is stating that nothing will be able to eliminate the problem entirely because assault is not merely a deficiency of the church but of society as a whole. While the writer admits that assault is a “human problem,” the quote is interpreted in a way that implies that any other sexual assault case is a failing of just the church.

The writer uses the church’s strong stance against capital punishment and abortion as backing for the argument that the church does not care, but those issues are a moral issue, not a “human problem.”

While the church can and should stand strong against assault, the writer misreads the pope setting realistic expectations as a sign that the church is apathetic.

Rin Swann


The writer, a senior at North Allegheny Senior High, wrote this letter for an Honors Argument class.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.