Letter to the editor: Property tax thwarts homeowners’ plans | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Property tax thwarts homeowners’ plans

My wife and I have reached the point in our lives where the kids are gone and our older home and land require more work than we’re able/willing to do, so we are attempting to downsize to a smaller property.

Unfortunately, a prohibiting factor is the high property tax on relatively newer homes that in most cases is two to three times our current tax rate and increasing every year. Most older homes in our price range with comparable taxes to what we currently pay require significant upgrades. We’ve considered subdividing a portion of our land and building a smaller home, but have been informed by township officials that there is no way to predict the future tax levy.

So, what do we do on our fixed income? We’d like to stay where we are, but the reality of physical limitations is an overriding concern. Should we purchase a smaller property with higher taxes and hope we can make future payments? Purchase and renovate a property, or build and hope we can handle the new tax? Or, do we leave family and friends and move to a more tax-friendly state?

We’d prefer to see the Legislature and governor gather the political will to address the property tax issue to the benefit of our senior citizens. No more empty promises like gambling revenue being used to reduce property taxes. Many seniors on fixed incomes are having to make decisions between eating, health care and paying property taxes. Now is the time to address it.

Richard Herd


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.