Letter to the editor: Proud of West Newton’s GAP efforts | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Proud of West Newton’s GAP efforts

The Trib’s “Staycations” feature about the Great Allegheny Passage hike and bike trail that stretches 148 miles from Pittsburgh to Washington, D.C. (“West Newton to Ohiopyle on the Great Allegheny Passage,” Oct. 27, TribLIVE) used West Newton as a starting place. And for good reason.

While two hiking trail sections were already in place, it was the work done by the folks in West Newton that got the total project started.

Under the auspices of the community development organization Downtown West Newton, work got under way to revamp the old, unused rail bed of the C&O that ran along the Youghiogheny River through town into a useable facility for hiking and biking. Many hours of work by volunteers for the town and the surrounding area as well as groups which formed along the right-of-way pitched in. Along with some grants and some help from Westmoreland County, what began as a far-off dream when started in the late 1980s came to fruition as the Yough River Trail in the mid-1990s.

What was a far-in-the-future possibility caught the imagination of folks all along the route. Other clubs of volunteers formed. Community development organizations, municipalities, counties all pitched in, including the City of Pittsburgh. We now not only have a fun place for our own town to enjoy but also a whole 150 miles of outdoor relaxation and continuing economic growth.

You can be mighty proud that your hard work and dedication got the Great Allegheny Passage started, West Newton!

Ed Collins

West Newton

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.