ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Racism & victims | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Racism & victims

Tribune-Review
| Monday, March 11, 2019 10:00 a.m

As a boy, I adored Roberto Clemente. Not just because he ran like he was on fire and threw like no one will again. He was the ultimate athlete/philanthropist, literally giving his life to help the oppressed. As an adult, I hope to someday vote for Condoleezza Rice for president. These are just two of the endless cases where blacks are superior to me physically, morally and intellectually. 

That said, I detest black leaders who push the corrosive, degrading narrative that blacks are forever victims — people like Al Sharpton, Maxine Waters and Kamala Harris. They do it to advance lucrative careers and lifestyles that have no correlation to those they exploit.

Does non-hoax racism exist? You bet it does. Is it rampant among white Americans? Absolutely not. Supremacists of any ilk are despicable. So are successful blacks — often politicians — who want all people of color to believe they’ll never be more than victims.

Take our prior president. Blessed with the world’s largest microphone, he knowingly ignored the “absentee father” issue and how it — not white privilege or red hats — is the greatest current impediment to blacks. Addressing this with passion, even once, would’ve inspired an entire nation to stop race-baiting and embrace family. Even now, he cares more for celebrity and legacy than leadership, still tracking closer to a Sharpton than an MLK.

As the son of poor, white parents from Braddock, the only privilege I recall was joint parental love and support. It was always more than enough, but nothing today’s black leaders ever seem to promote.

Robert Szypulski

Penn Township, Westmoreland County

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.