Letter to the editor: Recalling unity of the Apollo moon landing | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Recalling unity of the Apollo moon landing

In 1963 in an interview with Life Magazine, Jackie Kennedy quoted a line from her late husband President Kennedy’s favorite musical: “… ‘Don’t let it be forgot that once there was a spot for one brief shining moment that was known as Camelot’.” She concluded by saying it would never be the same.

It seemed her words would be prophetic as the decade of the ’60s was one of the most divisive and violent in our history. Yet for four days, from lift-off on July 20 to splash-down on July 24, we had that shining moment. With the Apollo moon landing, which we celebrate this week, we put aside our differences. We were just Americans. We stood united and proud. What many people believed was an impossible task, we accomplished. Working together with a common goal, regardless of race, color or creed, the impossible became possible. The next time we came together in that way sadly was that tragic September day in 2001.

As we celebrate the 50th anniversary of the moon landing, let us learn from the past. Let not tragedy unite us. Let it be achievements that unite us. Let it be that we have learned that when we put aside our political differences, when we work together as a people regardless of race, color or creed, the impossible can become possible.

Yes, let us hope and pray that there are many shining moments left for us to celebrate as a nation As Americans.

Kurt Karafinski


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.