Letter to the editor: Remembering Oak Lake Golf Course | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Remembering Oak Lake Golf Course

I wanted to add to Mary Ann Thomas’ article on the closure and sale of Oak Lake (“Auction at Oak Lake Golf Course in Upper Burrell draws hundreds,” Oct. 26, TribLIVE).

The original 9-hole course was designed and built by brothers Bert and Judd Dunbar of Lower Burrell, along with Ike Finn, around 1956. Sometime in the early 1970s, the course was sold to Conley, which expanded it to 18 holes. The second nine was designed by a golf course architect who did an excellent job of working with limited acreage to build a relatively short “shot-makers” course that rewarded accuracy and course management rather than brute strength.

Unfortunately, given the lessened interest in golf, along with changing demographics and the economy, the appraisal concept of “highest and best use” would indicate that a housing development is where the future of these 113 acres lies, similar to the fate of the Swank Dairy Farm in Lower Burrell.

Reading the article was bittersweet. It brought back fond memories of playing there, but also was like reading the pre-death obituary of an elderly golf icon. I regret that I won’t be able to pay my respects by playing one final round and attending the auction.

Thanks to the Dunbars and the Conley family for the memories and good stewardship of the course. I will be interested to read about the selling price of the land, as well as the buyer’s plans for the course.

John Gordon

Niceville, Fla.

The writer is a Lower Burrell native.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.