Letter to the editor: Seeing reality of Trump | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Seeing reality of Trump

I am continually amazed by those who either cannot or will not think for themselves, or who refuse to see reality.

Letter-writer George Biskup (“Collateral damage from anti-Trump actions,” Sept. 9, Trib LIVE) asked whether President Trump will ever get cooperation. Has he forgotten, or doesn’t realize, that the same was true for President Obama? Biskup also writes of Congress members calling Trump obscene names. Can he not see that such actions were initiated by Trump? He writes of actions that are “tramping on our Constitution just to damn Trump.” Trump is, in many cases, the one trampling the Constitution.

Susan Dudak (“Why I’m voting for Trump,” Sept. 10, TribLIVE) wrote of Trump protecting freedom of speech. How can this be true when Trump slanders, libels, denigrates and/or fires people who are not in lockstep with him, anyone who is in any way critical of him and his ideas? She speaks of socialism being an additional tax burden; yes, that is true. But: A better than 20% tax break for businesses while the tax break for private citizens is only one-third that percentage? The fact is, the federal deficit continues to climb.

Through his slanderous comments against anyone critical of him, his firing of officials not in lockstep with him, his outrageous comments (i.e., “I alone can fix (the “system”)”; “I know more about ISIS than the generals do”) — Trump seems to be in the same bent as Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Franco and Putin, desiring to be dictator.

George A. West

Ligonier Township

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.