Letter to the editor: Seniors deserve increased Medicaid funding for nursing homes | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Seniors deserve increased Medicaid funding for nursing homes

Our commonwealth has the fourth oldest population in the nation, and our fastest growing population is individuals 85 and older. Many of these residents will increasingly need intensive around-the-clock care for such diseases as Alzheimer’s and dementia. And make no mistake: This segment of our population will continue to grow.

But the sobering reality is that Pennsylvania is not taking the necessary steps to prepare for the approaching wave of aging residents. Gov. Tom Wolf’s administration has indicated that the sick, frail and elderly aren’t a priority: For the fifth consecutive year, Wolf proposed flat funding for Medicaid rates in long-term care facilities such as nursing homes.

You can tell a lot about which members of our society we value by the support we show them. Our aging parents, grandparents and loved ones with complex medical needs matter. They deserve better than to be forgotten by our governor.

That’s why I went to Harrisburg earlier this month to ask our legislators to increase Medicaid funding for nursing home care this year. Our neighbors, friends and families deserve it.

Walter Kingera

North Huntingdon

The writer is senior administrator of Transitions Healthcare North Huntingdon.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.