Letter to the editor: Sloan Campus work to impact drivers | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Sloan Campus work to impact drivers

Murrysville Council on Aug. 21 voted 5-2 to approve the hauling away of excess and unusable dirt from the Franklin Regional Sloan Campus site (“Murrysville Council approves excavation plan for ‘poor soil’ on Sloan construction site,” Aug. 22, TribLIVE). This vote was in response to the July 29 surprise request from Advanced Builders, Franklin Regional site contractor, to remove up to 12,000 cubic yards of excess, unusable soil from the Sloan Campus building site.

Until receiving this notice, all previous communication from Franklin Regional School District or its contractors had predicted only on-site soil movement. Documented soil test reports from 2018 specifically identified massive amounts of unuseable soil throughout the Sloan Campus site, and planned removal and replacement with up to 8000 cubic yards of new base materials. None of this soil hauling had been divulged to Murrysville Council during the last year, throughout the municipality’s project review process.

For the Sloan School area neighbors and nearby commuters, expect daily daytime travel impacts of trucks on Crowfoot and Sardis roads and Route 22 through much of 2019-20.

Walter Cebulak

Murrysville


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.