Letter to the editor: Steelers won’t overcome Mike Tomlin | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Steelers won’t overcome Mike Tomlin

The Steelers’ season opener debacle demonstrated what I have said for years: Mike Tomlin is a lousy coach. He has gotten by due to an abundance of talented players who were able to win in spite of Tomlin’s poor decision-making.

With the loss of Antonio Brown and Le’Veon Bell, the team is not talented enough to overcome Tomlin’s inadequacies. The Patriots are very good every year with far less talent.

Patriots coach Bill Belichick is a master at utilizing aging players, no-name backs/receivers and clever game plans to overcome a shortage of ability, something Tomlin could never do. For example, in the playoff game against Jacksonville two years ago, Tomlin called for an unsuccessful onside kick in the third quarter, which lead to a quick Jaguars score. Then in the final moments of the fourth quarter, he elected to kick the ball deep when we had to get the ball and quick score for the win.

As a field general his shortcomings have been obvious for years, and the Brown and Bell situations have highlighted his failings in the locker room. I fear he is returning us to the Steelers of the ’60s.

Jeff Gross

Matthews, N.C.

The writer is a former resident of Monroeville, Murrysville and North Huntingdon, and a lifelong Steelers fan.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.