ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Sunday hunting | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Sunday hunting

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, February 28, 2019 10:00 a.m

I speak for legions of outdoors-loving residents and non-residents alike who welcome Sunday as a day to walk, hike, bird/wildlife watch, mountain bike, etc. without the worry or threat of hunters in the neighborhood (“Sunday hunting clears first hurdle in state Senate,” Feb. 5, TribLIVE).

If you watch wildlife, you are often not wearing bright orange or similar clothing. The same goes for other activities. This is a danger if there are active hunters around. Non-hunters should have one day each week to be free to roam the forests.

The limit of the proposed 14 hunting Sundays is deceiving because the prime time to enjoy Pennsylvania’s gorgeous forests is late September through early November, which dovetails with most hunting seasons. Those fall Sundays are the prime time for non-hunters to flock to the natural areas. Those same people are quite likely to also visit a café or restaurant, stop to shop along the way for antiques, etc., and buy material to enjoy the activity which will generate tax revenue, not to mention fuel taxes to get there.

The long-term decline in hunting licenses and related equipment sales has led to a sharp decline in revenue to support the Game Commission’s mission of preserving and enlarging the game land. Non-hunters like us enjoy and use the same land.

Could there be a creative way to engage non-hunters in the funding? A further decline in active hunting is probably inevitable, so how do we move forward creatively to provide fair access for all to our priceless and unique wild areas and keep Sunday a day of (hunting) rest?

Richard Stoner

Unity

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.