Letter to the editor: Support bold climate action | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Support bold climate action

Thank you for publishing the op-ed by Penn State climate scientist Michael Mann and PennEnvironment’s Flora Cardoni (“Moving Pa. to clean-energy powerhouse,” March 29, TribLIVE). Thank you for raising awareness of the urgent need for action on climate change and bringing to light solutions.

Renewable energy portfolio standards at the state level are a great policy tool to move us toward the goal of a renewable energy economy by 2050 (at the latest).

Another powerful policy tool is to put a steadily rising price on greenhouse gas pollution, which would encourage individuals and businesses to make energy decisions that are good for the planet and good for their pocketbooks. The Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act would do just that. This bill would drive down greenhouse gas pollution 90% by 2050, has bipartisan support, and would give money back to people by giving the money collected from the fee back to individuals and households.

Let’s call on our Pennsylvania senators and representatives to support bold climate action, working together to preserve a liveable climate for Pennsylvanians.

Dana Siler

Squirrel Hill

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.