Letter to the editor: Tax well running dry in Buffalo Township | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Tax well running dry in Buffalo Township

Here we go again, another proposed tax increase in Buffalo Township (“Freeport Area looking at tax hikes for proposed $33.5M budget,” May 2, TribLIVE). The Freeport Area School Board must have had dreams on how to spend more money again.

Buffalo gets an average increase of $80, while residents of Armstrong County get an average increase of $20. This is like rubbing salt into a wound when the Armstrong School District superintendent makes $170,464 per year and Freeport’s superintendent makes $148,00 per year (“Comparing superintendent salaries in the Alle-Kiski Valley,” May 5, TribLIVE).

Those raising families or on fixed incomes and seniors cannot continue to support the spending Freeport is doing. Every year it is another increase to everyone’s tax package. Look at their reasonings of the past: a new high school with all the bells and whistles. This decision has arguments all around, but was it really needed? Then we have the athletic facilities that weren’t needed, but Mr. and Mrs. Taxpayer got saddled with them anyway.

Freeport business manager Ryan Manzer said “Things are happening around us that we cannot control.” Well, if they can’t be controlled, then we need to find someone who can control them. President Dan Lucovich and the school board must realize Buffalo Township doesn’t have a cash cow hidden away anywhere.

Freeport is heading down the same path as the Penn Hills School District — new schools, new athletic facilities, debt and higher tax demands. Except the well is running dry in Buffalo Township.

Jack Juris

Buffalo Township

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.