Letter to the editor: Greta Thunberg deserves Medal of Freedom | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Greta Thunberg deserves Medal of Freedom

In an enlightened administration, the remarkable 16-year-old climate activist Greta Thunberg might be in line to receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom, which was initiated by President Kennedy to honor those who engage in significant public or private endeavors. The bestowing of such an award on one like Thunberg will never happen under Donald Trump.

This president has presented the prestigious award to 11 individuals, seven of them figures from the world of sports. There has been no awarding of it to any representative of the arts and culture, no humanitarian, no one who has fought for the downtrodden, no journalist who has risked life and limb to report the news, and it is difficult to envision any such individual enthusiastically accepting the award from a president who is so often anathema to what is laudatory and honorable, and who is lacking in basic human decency.

The president heads the only major political party in the civilized world that rejects science, holding out against the reality of climate change and the need to address it — hence we have what in reality is the Environmental Destruction Agency, an entity which now nods to big business as regulations which helped to facilitate clean air and water are weakened, rendering us an outlier among the nations.

Perhaps the Nobel Peace Prize will someday be in the hands of an extraordinary young woman like Thunberg. May she know that she has the admiration of myriad people throughout the world and that our president does not legitimately act in our name.

Oren Spiegler

Peters Township

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.