Letter to the editor: To solve problems, we must follow Bible’s direction | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: To solve problems, we must follow Bible’s direction

Why can’t we respect the fact that everyone has an opinion, whether or not it is one we agree with? I refer in particular to letter-writer Al Duerig (“Trump-Jesus comparison blasphemous,” Oct. 1, TribLIVE), who calls Trump supporters blind, stupid or rich. Why can’t you just state your case without the name-calling?

The answer to most of today’s problems can be found in the next letter, I think (“Heart of man must change,” Oct. 1, TribLIVE). Michael Matievich, with the wisdom of age, gives the answer clearly. We, the people, are our own worst enemy. Unless and until we return to our old-fashioned values, with Christ and family as the center of our lives, none of today’s problems can or will be solved. We must respect each other and be respectable ourselves. Follow the directions for living found in the Bible, where you will not find name-calling acceptable, Mr. Duerig.

Before anyone has a fit because I use Christ as the example, notice that my response is to that example. Not being well versed in other religions, I can’t factually comment on them. However, from the little that I do know, I don’t think any of them condone hatred … even Muslims.

In 1996 I wrote a letter suggesting parents should not let their children play in the street. Last year I wrote that parents should not allow their children to have access to guns. This is progress?

Eileen Condie

Hempfield


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.