Letter to the editor: Trump’s pathetic grudge | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Trump’s pathetic grudge

A television commercial actor says proudly that his insurance company “doesn’t hold grudges.” President Donald Trump does — even beyond the grave. While family, friends and others still mourn the passing of war hero Sen. John McCain, Trump never learned not to speak ill of the dead.

Those who served in the military hold special heroes like McCain, a tortured POW and long-time public servant. Trump, who received five deferments, including one for bone spurs in his heels, doesn’t understand this. Draft-dodgers never do.

I didn’t vote for McCain in his quest for the presidency. His views and mine were poles apart. But I greatly respected the man, never more so than when during his campaign he cut off a supporter who mouthed untrue things about McCain’s opponent, then-Sen. Barack Obama. I seriously doubt that Trump’s “lock her up” crowd would approve such civility.

I have come to understand that the president’s support base cares not that their leader is a liar and, I believe, a racist, a person who mocks the disabled, and worse. I now believe that he gives voice to their own dark sides, saying things they know to be wrong.

Even South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham came up lame in his response to Trump’s disrespect for his late pal. Sucking up to his new best friend is now more important to Graham. How pathetic.

Glenn R. Plummer

Unity


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.