Letter to the editor: Unions give workers power | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Unions give workers power

Our working men and women are in dire condition. The average CEO in this country earns 400 times more than the average worker on a production line. The top 10% control 90% of the money.

This situation is similar to what was happening in the early part of the 20th century. One important event that happened was the birth of powerful unions like the United Mine Workers (UMW), which led to eventual development of the AFL-CIO. Quickly, union leaders received the right to collective bargaining and they had a seat at the table with corporate leaders. The result was better working conditions, benefits and wages.

Although there was some decline in union numbers, to a great degree this was the situation until Ronald Reagan became president. He attacked the union representing the airport flight controllers (PATCO), and the other unions in this country did not come to their defense. Reagan was able to decertify PATCO, and this led to successful corporate attacks on many unions. Union membership nosedived to the point where only 10.7% of workers are represented by unions today.

Since labor unions are not nearly as powerful as they once were, workers’ wages, conditions and benefits have stagnated. It is difficult to reverse this history, but if workers would take a page from those old leaders in the UMW, they could unite and form potent unions to gain a powerful seat at the bargaining table. Perhaps some of the profits they produce could be shared by corporate leaders.

Richard P. Davis


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.