Letter to the editor: US has done well on environment | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: US has done well on environment

The recent raising of the discussion on climate change by our Democratic Party members must be viewed with one important requirement. Over the last few decades, the United States has done a darn good job of cleaning up our environment. No, it is not perfect, nor is it completed, but it is darn good, using good old U.S. civil Democratic and Republican discussions, negotiations and methods wherein we would come to agreed upon sensible approaches to clean things up. We should pat ourselves on the back and share these methods with the others on our planet.

For some reason, this has now been deemed an insufficient approach, and we have representatives on the Democratic side telling us we must spend billions, and maybe trillions, more dollars, and impact our lifestyle, to save the planet, and we must do it now.

I do not know if man is really making the impact that they believe, but there is one thing for sure I do know: If any plan does not include at least China and India, and parts of Russia, in a binding agreement, then any more money spent by us will have such a small effect that it will be a waste of time in trying to accomplish the stated goal of “saving our planet.”

Joe Kujawski

Buffalo Township

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.