Letter to the editor: US must focus on research | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: US must focus on research

This month marks an important date for the scientific community across the globe. The Nobel Prizes will be announced in Stockholm Oct. 7-14.

The United States has amassed many of these prizes, with more than 300 laureates scattered across the country in some of the most prestigious institutes.

Without research, there can be no innovations or breakthrough discoveries that play a pivotal role in world economy.

Moving into the 21st century, many Asian countries have progressed in sciences and have emerged as global leaders in research. Inevitably, this will tip the balance of the Nobel Prize itself, undergoing a global shift from West to the East.

The United States for many decades has dominated the sciences, but is now showing signs of diminished research performance.

Our academic institutes share a similar fate; hence, it is highly imperative that our nation, with all its potential, shift its focus on research so we can win back the sciences and stimulate industrial innovation, ensuring a sustainable future for job growth.

Nayyar Ahmed


The writer is an assistant professor of biology at at University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.