Letter to the editor: Walter Williams’ op-ed misleading | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Walter Williams’ op-ed misleading

On a recent Saturday morning I opened the paper to an op-ed by Walter Williams (“Being a racist is easy today,” Aug. 2, TribLIVE), who has built a career as a black conservative, and who appears to have extreme right-wing views which are biased, if not racist.

I am a self confessed liberal, a white person — and was angry and sad later on that day when this op-ed came out, because our nation would experience the third brutal mass shooting in a week by an alleged white domestic terrorist. I have a First Amendment right to speak if I feel my paper has lost its moral compass. I feel this op-ed is misleading.

His op-ed is wrong about two things: Liberals have many arguments right now, winning ones at that, and we are not “falsely accusing” anyone. That is a right-wing trope. Instead, we look in the mirror and ask ourselves if we know right from wrong.

He’s right about one thing: that older black Americans “need to explain what true racism is … to inform young black people.” There is no such thing as true racism, only just racism. You either got it or you don’t.

It isn’t hard to see why this opinion piece made it into your paper. It’s just so easy to not know what else to print, and it’s “Easy to be Hard,” a song from “Hair,” written when it was hard (and still is hard) to be a protester, a humanitarian, a feminist.

Laurie Lucianne Scheid

New Kensington


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.