ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: We need the wall | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: We need the wall

I’m sure everyone is tired of the childish way our government is being run. No longer is our government for the people but strictly for party only. I’ve not talked to one person who is against a wall. 

Recently I was getting a haircut at Quinio’s barber shop in Natrona Heights. The police had put a camera in the shop window to watch for drug dealers coming from Sheldon Park to sell their product. Of course, the camera did nothing to stop the drugs. What to do? A wall was built. No longer could the dealers come through this corridor to the plaza.

Each and every one of us is protected by a wall. It’s called a house. At night we lock our windows and doors that are the only entrance through our walls. Some go farther and build walls around their yards.

We spend billions of dollars every year sending our men and women to protect other countries. Yet we can’t spend a few billion to protect ourselves? How did the MS-13 gangs get from Mexico to the U.S. to commit their crimes? How many of the illegal drugs here come from other countries? How many unvaccinated people bring disease here? How many young boys and girls are brought here to be used as sex slaves?

There are no perfect solutions, but we must try. Build a wall. Our children’s future may depend on it. A camera will not protect them.

Calvin Fatchet

Freeport




TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.