Letter to the editor: What is ‘supremacy’? | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: What is ‘supremacy’?

I offer this opinion at the risk of being labeled, but I believe that it’s important that the term “supremacy” deserves greater scrutiny.

I first heard the term years ago. It gradually and ultimately disappeared as a result of the civil rights movement begun in the ’60s. The left has resurrected the term as a device to define what they believe are ignoble motives of the right.

They are right to an extent. Some whites probably view minorities on the basis of race and/or customs and mores they believe to be inferior. On the other hand, it is my belief that these views have largely disappeared. There is more than sufficient evidence to support this. So why does the left have the need to use this tactic?

Let’s stipulate that slavery and Jim Crow have curtailed minority advancement. However, as evil as they were, they cannot detract from the contributions made by whites for advancements in human rights, medicine, engineering, science, education, transportation, agriculture, economic freedom and growth, social services, and so many more.

Why must the left generalize that these accomplishments are attributed to privilege? To be sure, some benefited from privilege. Some probably benefited from nefarious acts. However, I believe most benefited from ambition, hard work, personal sacrifice, love and care of family, and equally important, a constitutional system and Bill of Rights that encouraged and protected individualism and self-achievement.

Louis F. D’Emilio

Penn Township, Westmoreland County


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.