Letter to the editor: Who wants self-driving cars? | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Who wants self-driving cars?

Some folks, somewhere within our consumer-driven economy, have decided to spend a major effort to develop self-driving vehicles.

The idea of being able to sit back in your own automobile and head out onto the open road and have the driving taken care of by some automated system and not worry about a thing has long fascinated the American driving public. Today, that flight of fancy has become an imminent reality. We are already sharing the streets and roads of Pittsburgh and Western Pennsylvania with developmental versions of autonomous robotic vehicles.

There have been some not-unexpected development problems. Ongoing tests with cars have experienced some accidents. Meanwhile, the trucking industry appears to be anxious to have its fleets of semi- behemoths certified for robotic operation.

So, now that this wondrous technological development is virtually a reality, some folks are having second thoughts. In fact, several public opinion surveys agree that more than half of the Americans polled would not like to ride in self-driving cars.

If a majority of the driving public don’t want to use it, are we still going ahead? No one has said “Wait a minute!” — so apparently the answer is “yes.”

Is this yet another major decision we are leaving to the wisdom of our government? To allow? To control?

Ed Collins

West Newton

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.