Letter to the editor: Wild claims about climate change, Trump, reparations | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Wild claims about climate change, Trump, reparations

Rudy Gagliardi makes some pretty preposterous statements in his letter “Trump will get my vote.”

He says “I think global warming is something Al Gore came up with to become a millionaire.” Seems pretty arrogant to think that nature gives a damn what you think. Are you a climatologist? Obviously not. Neither is Trump, or the bloviators on Fox News. The majority of real scientists who study climate agree climate change is an imminent threat.

If you don’t believe the scientists, just look at the evidence. July was the hottest month on record. Ice is melting and sea level is rising. We are having more 100-year storms. Gagliardi must be willfully blind to ignore the obvious fact that the real money is being made in denying climate change, not inventing a hoax.

When he says Trump “has done more good for our country in two years than most presidents have done in eight,” I wonder what he is talking about. Was it the trillions of dollars of debt we incurred by his tax breaks for the rich? Was it that Trump has buddied up with our enemies and alienated our friends and allies? Or the 76 environmental laws overturned so the rich can get richer at the expense of our earth?

I think Gagliardi must have meant “reparations,” not “repatriations,” should be paid to living slaves; in any case, he knows perfectly well that there are no living slaves, at least in the sense he implies.

Do I infer from his third paragraph that he thinks Obama is a racist? Details, please.

Al Duerig


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.