Letter to the editor: Wind turbines kill birds | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Wind turbines kill birds

I’m glad someone finally published something about missing birds (“Missing: Nearly 3 billion birds that used to live in North America,” Sept. 19, TribLIVE). If you do your research, you will discover that wind turbines kill a year roughly 500,000 birds each year. It’s estimated that 900,000 bats are also killed annually by wind turbines, 30% higher than in 2009. There is also quite a bit of research out there as to how much natural resources are required to put one wind turbine up. Not to mention the cost of resources to build one.

This is all conveniently overlooked by climate scaremongers, the Audubon Society, Greenpeace, the Sierra Club, et al. Why? Because it does not fit the narrative that New York City will be under water next year.

You may also want to check out the damage to the environment that producing just one electric battery for one car does. Or the human cost to mine precious metals in developing countries or China. It’s easy to find data that says you can put thousands and thousands of vehicles on the road using fossil fuel for less impact on the environment.

Peter A. Mamula


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.