Letter to the editor: Gov. Tom Wolf’s tax plan will hurt consumers | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Gov. Tom Wolf’s tax plan will hurt consumers

Gov. Tom Wolf must enjoy Groundhog Day, as his latest plan, Restore Pennsylvania, is simply the same attempt to tax and borrow on the backs of citizens. Like Groundhog Day, Wolf’s plan is the same every year. The only difference is that every year he masks his attempt to tax the natural gas industry with some new, slick rhetoric.

The Restore Pennsylvania plan is simply the governor’s way of achieving a campaign promise to tax an industry that has delivered affordable prices for consumers, saved taxpayers money and provided economic growth for Pennsylvania. Additionally, the natural gas industry has paid nearly $1.5 billion in taxes already.

As Pennsylvania continues to make good use of our natural resources for both economic and security gains, the future of the industry may be impacted by yet another attempt by Wolf to accomplish a severance tax. Five years ago, he told us this tax would raise over $1 billion in Pennsylvania. The math simply did not support that rhetoric five years ago and today the governor’s message that a tax can “Restore Pennsylvania” must also be rejected. This tax will only hurt consumers and reverse Pennsylvania’s economic growth.

Randi Fowler Bick

Upper St. Clair


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.