ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Wolf's minimum wage II

| Saturday, March 12, 2016, 9:00 p.m.

The Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center applauds Gov. Tom Wolf for raising the minimum wage for state workers and workers whose companies are on contract with the state.

Prior to his action, these workers who are heads of household and making the minimum wage were not making enough money to live above the poverty line. It should be our moral obligation, as a commonwealth, to ensure those working in Pennsylvania are paid enough to make ends meet for their families.

This is the first step in increasing the minimum wage for all workers in Pennsylvania. Doing this not only helps working people, it relieves pressure on Pennsylvania's budget.

People making the minimum wage spend almost every dime they earn. Raising the minimum wage generates new economic activity. The Keystone Research Center estimates a higher minimum wage will increase revenues from the state income tax by $45.6 million and the sales tax by $75.9 million.

It will also decrease state spending, as many workers making the minimum wage will move from traditional Medicaid to the expanded Medicaid created by the Affordable Care Act. The federal government reimburses Pennsylvania for just under half the cost of traditional Medicaid, but the reimbursement for expanded Medicaid is 90 percent or more. We estimate that raising the minimum wage for all Pennsylvanians will reduce state spending by $104 million.

We face a structural deficit of about $2 billion, so we can't afford to miss this opportunity to reduce it by $225 million simply by raising the minimum wage to $10.10.

Marc Stier


The author is the director of the Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me