ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Devious Democrats & reeking Republicans

| Friday, April 29, 2016, 8:57 p.m.

I have always been involved in politics and have worked for a number of candidates. I am so disillusioned with the political “system.” High-ranking officials of both parties want to choose the candidates for the highest office in the land.

Hillary Clinton with her superdelegates had the nomination locked up months ago in my opinion. Now the old Republican guard wants to choose its candidate. They do not want Donald Trump. I believe they do not want him to rock the boat of their cushy lifestyles, so they are going to try to shove their choice down our throats. Why even vote?

I think the person with the most votes should get the nomination. I do not think it should be a bunch of delegates who can throw our votes aside and go with the establishment's choice. If there is a brokered convention, the Trump delegates are bound to vote for him on the first ballot. On a second or third ballot they can choose anyone. Does that not reek of backroom politics? It makes you wonder if we have any say at all.

Career politicians think they know best but just look at what they have done to this once-respected country.

Julie Walczer

Delmont

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me