ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Work together NK-A, Burrell

| Wednesday, May 4, 2016, 9:00 p.m.

As a Valley High School student, I supported the 2014 New Kensington-Arnold School Board decision to merge and close some of the district's schools under the belief that no teachers would be lose their jobs. But the the board has sent furlough notices to teachers the last two years, with 21 receiving them for 2016-17.

The students are being shown they are unworthy of an intellectually stimulating education. The district has low test/performance scores. Is the solution fewer educators?

I believe the only viable solution to the NKASD's problems is some form of amalgamation with the Burrell School District. Amalgamating early educational facilities beginning with Pre-K would form better relationships between children and heighten educational experiences. It would construct an integrated environment that focuses on equal parts standard and support, while lowering the financial strain on parents in both districts.

According to the Community Foundation of Westmoreland County, Arnold has a heartbreakingly high child-poverty rate. Yet, every child has the potential for success.

By observing my senior class, I have learned that a competitive environment increases motivation. My class has earned the highest collective scholarship amount in recent Valley High history ($5.8 million). One student will be attending Yale University. The merger would encourage more of this.

I realize this idea may never come to fruition. It is unfortunate the educational system is treated like a business rather than a means to create a brighter future for every child.

Skylar Houck

New Kensington

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me