ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Proper usage, please

| Friday, June 10, 2016, 8:57 p.m.

I graduated from a small Catholic high school in 1963. English was by far my worst subject. In my first year in college, I was required to take two semesters of English. I barely passed both. Now I find myself noting common errors. One is saying someone did something instead of saying something was done. For example, someone broke into a home in Sheraden, instead of a home was broken into in Sheraden.

Another one that drives me crazy is using the word amount instead of number. For example, the amount of troops needed in Syria, instead of the number of troops needed. Amount refers to things that are fungible, like the amount of gasoline required to go 500 miles for a particular car. Another is using an adjective instead of the noun. One of the best examples: the Democratic convention instead of the Democrat convention. Use of the word busted instead of broken or smashed or shattered. There are others to numerous to mention here.

Basic things I learned way back in high school make me feel like a Ph.D. in English today. It illustrates how far we've come in the denigration of our education system.

Harvey Bower

Mt. Lebanon

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me