ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Pipeline's promising prospects

| Thursday, Sept. 1, 2016, 8:55 p.m.

Pennsylvania's shale boom has produced a great example of collaboration between America's energy and manufacturing industries, as well as an opportunity to support American manufacturing jobs.

Here's how: All 350 miles of the proposed Mariner East 2 pipeline project's new 20-inch-plus pipe will be bought from and rolled by American steel plants — all of which are represented by the United Steelworkers. That's 75,000 tons of steel — and a lot of man hours.

In fact, I would call the massive American-made investments in both the Mariner East 1 and 2 projects one of the strongest behind-the-scenes accomplishments of the Pennsylvania Steel Alliance. According to Econsult Solutions, these projects will support 30,000 jobs along their routes during construction.

Marcellus shale has positioned Pennsylvania as the second-largest producer of natural gas in the U.S., trailing only Texas. But to fully harness this natural resource's full potential, constructing the pipeline's infrastructure with American-made materials is a must.

This project does just that. With that in mind, I encourage Pennsylvania's leaders to support American manufacturing by supporting Mariner East 2 today.

Scott Paul

Washington, D.C.

The writer is president of the Alliance for American Manufacturing, a partnership established in 2007 by some of America's leading manufacturers and the United Steelworkers Union.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me