ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Lowly thievery

| Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2016, 2:09 p.m.

Lowly thievery

For the third time, someone came onto my property and stole my Hillary Clinton sign. From what I've heard, I'm not the only victim. Quite a few signs were stolen recently in what appears to be a coordinated effort.

I realize that in Hempfield, I am in the minority in my support of Hillary. But I believe in the process. Everyone has the right to support his/her candidate without fear of having her property damaged or stolen. I do not know of any Donald Trump signs being stolen, so I can only assume that Trump supporters are behind the thefts.

My question to them is this: What gives you the right to believe you are above the law? Do you somehow feel justified in the support of your “law and order” candidate that you are no longer bound by the laws of our community? Do conservatives no longer consider “thou shalt not steal” part of their value system?

I was a Republican for 42 years. It is this type of mentality, coupled with the meanness and hatred that has become the cornerstone of conservatism, that chased me away from the party. Regardless of whom you support in this campaign, we should all respect one another's beliefs and choices, not to mention property.

Consider your actions before you commit another crime. In the meantime, kindly stop trampling my flower bed.

Carol Mintus

Hempfield

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me