ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, March 16, 2017, 8:55 p.m.

Lance:To another Springdale payout. Seems like a familiar routine — Springdale settles another federal lawsuit. The borough agreed this week to pay former police Chief Julio Medeiros a yet-to-be-disclosed amount over his firing in 2015. When will the borough stop opening itself to these costly lawsuits? The council fired Medeiros for alleged misuse of paid time off and insubordination. But eventually, it ends up having to pay him and his lawyer. The borough won't even say right away how much the settlement will cost. Solicitor Craig Alexander said Springdale's insurance carrier, not taxpayers, is on the hook. Maybe he forgot who pays the insurance premiums. It's taxpayers. These settlements could drive up insurance rates.

Laurel:To donated land. Walkers and bikers who use Altermoor and the Rachel Carson Trail will appreciate this: The family of an Italian immigrant couple who lived in the Alle-Kiski Valley have donated about 2 acres of land to Harrison Township. The land was too narrow for houses so the family of Mike and Rose Ricci decided not to let it sit idle or go to waste. Thanks to their generosity, bikers and walkers on the trails may soon get a place to catch their breath. Commissioner Robin Bergstrom says her initial vision for the space would be to add some benches or a rest area. Great idea.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me