ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Time to build

| Wednesday, May 24, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

Building out and modernizing our region's and the nation's infrastructure is a critical goal that's broadly supported by voters across the political spectrum. Regionally, infrastructure development is a clear winner for Pennsylvania. According to a recent report from consulting firm ICF, U.S. energy infrastructure development can create more than 1 million new American jobs by 2035. In Pennsylvania, two critical energy projects, Mariner East II and PennEast, are projected to support more than 25,000 good-paying local jobs, including many for building-trades union members.

To meet these growing demands, local unions are expanding their apprenticeship programs to prepare workers for energy careers. As International Union of Operating Engineers Local 66 business manager Jim Kunz said in the article “Heavy equipment apprentices anticipate construction boom, train near New Alexandria,” energy development is “definitely good for our members, but it's also good for the region.

Infrastructure is enabling a manufacturing revitalization for Pennsylvania families and workers. We're seeing this at the Shell petrochemical facility in Beaver County. And there's more opportunity on the horizon. A new IHS Markit report, commissioned by Gov. Tom Wolf's administration, highlighted those opportunities, noting Pennsylvania's abundant energy resources can transform the commonwealth into a petrochemical manufacturing hub. With the right regulatory and tax policies, given our world-class natural gas resources and workforce, Pennsylvania has the potential to attract investment, create jobs and fully realize a bright and promising future. For these reasons, and many more, it's time to build.

Erica Clayton Wright

North Fayette

The writer is vice president of communications and membership for the Marcellus Shale Coalition (

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me