ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Storms & climate change

| Thursday, Oct. 5, 2017, 8:55 p.m.

Thank you for your coverage of hurricanes Harvey and Irma — especially the article “Hurricane Irma toll hits 10, increasing threat for Florida.” With these intense storms, we have an opportunity to talk about how climate change will impact storms of the future. Avoiding this topic is like a doctor not talking to lung-cancer patients about smoking.

While climate scientists cannot link a particular storm to climate change, Harvey and Irma provide a window into how a warming world can amplify hurricanes. Climate scientists agree that greenhouse-gas emissions from burning fossil fuels are raising global temperatures.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported that the Gulf of Mexico was 4 degrees above normal where Harvey formed — adding moisture to the storm. On Aug. 26, Harvey produced rainfall rates of over 6 inches per hour. Climate change does not affect the path or number of hurricanes, but climate models predict an increase in moisture and intensity of storms.

Now is the time to help those who have had their lives turned upside down by Harvey and Irma. Now is the time to change course to avoid the worst of climate change's natural disasters — by putting a price on fossil fuels and rebating the fee back to consumers. We can do both, and we owe it to our kids to do both.

Dana Siler

Squirrel Hill

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me