ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Renewable energy achievable

| Sunday, Oct. 1, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

I feel the authors of the column “Working toward Pa.'s future” ignored the opportunity the clean-energy industry provides to Pittsburgh.

The renewable energy field is ready to help build a brighter, safer and smarter energy future. When fossil fuel industries talk about jobs and costs, they ignore the externalities from extraction, refining and use that endanger our citizens.

Pittsburgh felt the crushing impact of the steel-mill shutdown and we continue to grapple with lasting impacts. But we've learned. We know how fracking harms our communities, from poisoning our water to lowering property values. We also know the benefits of moving to a clean-energy economy: an industry that honors local health.

I moved from California to Pittsburgh to attend Pitt, and I've noticed a lack of concern Pennsylvanians seem to have about the environment. These issues touch all of our lives. Pittsburghers deserve clean energy that doesn't put them at risk.

Renewable energy is not only necessary but achievable, and Pittsburgh could be a leader in the industry. With over 70,000 clean-energy jobs already in Pennsylvania, support for renewable energy will improve our community by bringing more good-paying, family-sustaining jobs.

Nicki Aviel


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me