ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Restitution due DIRECTV users

| Wednesday, Oct. 4, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

On Dec. 21, 2010, Pennsylvania's Commonwealth Court approved a “Consent Petition for Final Decree and Judgement” against DirecTV for its consumer practices.

The Conference of Consumer Organizations has been relentlessly campaigning for the resolution of these claims. We received no cooperation from Attorneys General Tom Corbett or Kathleen Kane. They never made a public announcement or called a meeting.

Attorney General Josh Shapiro's office is paying attention. Senior Deputy Attorney General Thomas J. Blessington signed the settlement agreement on behalf of the commonwealth and consumers in Pennsylvania. We received a letter from Blessington on Aug. 15 offering consumers positive guidance:

“DirecTV was required by the Consent Petition to attempt to resolve the Eligible Complaints by offering the consumer restitution and/or some other appropriate relief. If DirecTV was unable to resolve the Eligible Complaint to the consumer's satisfaction, DirecTV was to inform the consumer of his or her ability to submit his or her complaint to a Claims Administrator for resolution.

“If you or any consumers have a complaint against DirecTV, we encourage you or any consumer to file a complaint form with the Office of Attorney General, Bureau of Consumer Protection. Consumers may call 1-800-441-2555 or obtain information online at .”

I'm asking every Pennsylvanian who has had any form of grief with DirecTV — or any other service provider — to contact Blessington, follow his instructions, and get the restitution you are owed.

The Rev. Roger Thomas

Harmony Township, Beaver County

The writer is chairman of the Conference of Consumer Organizations.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me