ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Athletes, entertainers & Apple

| Saturday, Oct. 7, 2017, 6:09 p.m.

Could there be a coincidence that the childish antics of overpaid professional athletes, the mostly infantile babble of the left-wing entertainment industry performers and the overzealous, pompous attacks on America by Silicon Valley are starting to take their toll?

Professional football by and large is a business that depends heavily on the “gubbment” allowing it to keep a nonprofit status for taxes and relies on the American taxpayer to fund its stadiums and arenas; antitrust laws do not apply to its broadcast deals. Fans who work hard for a living and pay their taxes are boycotting the games en masse.

The entertainment industry relies heavily on tax breaks and loan guarantees from states where it films. A 2009 Pennsylvania Legislative Budget and Finance Committee analysis found that the state lost more than $58 million on its $75 million film tax credit grant program. It would be one thing if these so-called entertainers could act, but in reality they are just like the overpaid teleprompter readers on the TV news shows; they read their lines.

Silicon Valley: Apple just released a new iPhone 8 and there were no lines at the stores. Maybe Timmy Cook, CEO of Apple, had better start thinking twice before he utters his next Silicon Valley statement about our “gubbment” and our leaders.

Joseph E. Krill


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me