ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Change not best for Fawn

| Wednesday, Oct. 18, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

November will be here before we know it, and with that, so will Election Day.

Before you cast your valued vote in Fawn Township, you should know the following facts:

• The township is 100-percent debt-free.

• Pension funds are fully funded.

• The township is no longer classified as a distressed township.

• There has not been a tax increase in 18 years.

These points have been achieved by the current board of supervisors over the last 12 years.

I am encouraging everyone to educate themselves by attending township meetings and understanding what the new candidates represent.

Change in this case is not best for the future of Fawn Township.

Patricia Bryant


The writer is a former Fawn Township secretary/treasurer and supervisor.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me