ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Urge congressmen to support global education

| Saturday, Oct. 28, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

Oct. 5 was World Teacher's Day. Most of us did not take notice because we take our education for granted. Some of the most important lessons I've learned in life came from my favorite teachers. Without their support and encouragement, I don't know where I'd be today.

Robert Lindsey was the best teacher, professor and mentor I've ever had. He didn't just teach high school history and psychology; he taught students how to live smarter. He cared genuinely about them and did everything in his power to ensure their success in every aspect of their lives.

It's been almost eight years since I sat in his classroom and not a week goes by that I don't think about the profound impact he had on my life. So it's hard to believe that 263 million children and youth around the world who should be in the classroom are not.

Education is the key to ending poverty and promoting peace around the world. Kids should be spending more time with teachers like Mr. Lindsey and less time starving and roaming the streets.

It's imperative that in such a divisive political time that our elected officials come together to promote the Global Partnership for Education. Sens. Bob Casey and Pat Toomey need to become co-sponsors of Senate Resolution 286 and support the role of the U.S. in ensuring tens of millions of children in the poorest countries have access to a quality education through the GPE.

Brady Smith

Penn Hills

The writer is an assistant program manager with Rise Against Hunger.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me