ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Pa. must focus on STEM

| Thursday, Nov. 16, 2017, 8:55 p.m.

The continued boom in Marcellus shale gas drilling is one example of why Pennsylvania needs a growing, skilled STEM workforce.

A recent RAND Corp. study highlighted current and future demands as industries grow and skilled laborers retire. Filling these positions will require a great STEM education at the K-12 level. Students need preparation for the future by making them career-ready, not just graduation-ready.

Educators need to create relationships with companies statewide so that students can be introduced to emerging careers. For example, we worked with BirdBrain Technologies of Pittsburgh to introduce new STEM skills to students by teaching them to write code to control robots. These relationships, as well as internships, field trips and virtual collaboration, involve valuable, hands-on experience that gives students ideas for their future career paths and the expertise to succeed in their chosen fields.

The Marcellus shale boom is just the beginning for STEM-related jobs. We need to provide students with the hands-on training, skills and technological capabilities to fill these high-paying jobs. Not doing so means we've failed Pennsylvania's future workers and the industries which will accelerate our commonwealth's economic growth.

Maurice “Reese” Flurie


The writer is CEO of Commonwealth Charter Academy.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me