ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Consolidation right move for West Leechburg

| Wednesday, Nov. 8, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

The Pennsylvania Joint State Government Commission recently completed a 282-page report on school consolidations as required by the state Legislature ( , pages 116-129 and 187-189). It rejected forced mergers and districts based on our 67 counties or intermediate units. Its conclusion was to simply make consolidation voluntary but provide state incentives.

It provided four case studies of school districts considering reorganization, including Leechburg Area School District (LASD), and moving West Leechburg Borough to the Kiski Area School District (KASD).

If West Leechburg dissolves the borough and becomes part of Allegheny Township, the report concludes, its students would attend KASD by default. The millage rate would decrease from 130 mills to 85 mills in KASD — a 35 percent drop in taxes.

If the borough wishes to remain intact, there is a simple five-step process to utilize, beginning with a petition to leave LASD and join KASD. In either case, educational intent must be proven. The report illustrates the wide disparity in test scores in favor of KASD. This, along with several other factors, would make proof easy.

LASD would still receive the same amount of state funding, negating the argument that the move would collapse LASD. For the West Leechburg mayor and council to do nothing, with LASD in September approving a $7.7 million bond issue (some for a track when LASD has no track team and a small walking track exists across the street at West Leechburg Park), is a dereliction of duty.

Tom Tarosky

West Leechburg

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me