ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Dems attacking elderly

| Sunday, Dec. 3, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

The article “Westmoreland Democrats to challenge absentee ballots erroneously granted by county elections officials” , with the subhead, “For years, voters have improperly been allowed to skip polls based solely on age,” states that “The Westmoreland County Democratic Committee will attempt to have a judge or the local election board disqualify many absentee ballots cast for the Nov. 7 election.”

Acknowledging due process, past practice and other legal issues to be possibly litigated, how dare you? How dare you attempt to deprive our conscientious elderly citizens of their sacred and most fundamental right to cast a ballot in an election, all after the fact and without notice due to a technicality which may or may not stand the test of proper judicial scrutiny.

In this action, you attack the most vulnerable among us because advancing age often means these uncertainties: failing health, lack of reliable transportation, limited mobility in bad weather, risk of falling injuries and even death, difficulties standing in line, time pressures in the voting booth and difficulties with voting machines.

Could it be that you wish to suppress the votes of the more mature and responsible members of our county who tend to favor conservative candidates? Why else would you pull such a stunt, unless it would benefit your incessant desire to hold and wield power at all costs?

William G. Steiner

Mt. Pleasant

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me