ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Hostages in our homes

| Tuesday, Dec. 5, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

Fear, arrogance, coercion, threats: It's a “FACT.” These are the oppressive weapons used by communist governments to “control” their serfs. They do it outright — no secrecy.

In Pennsylvania, the government uses identical weapons, but they call them by nicer names, such as legislation and law — all, they tell you, for your own good.

They tell you how proud they are to “serve” you. But if you make an objective list of the things your “servant” has done that have improved your life, it should take you about 30 seconds.

Beholden for their careers to teachers (leechers) unions and uneducated, ignorant dolts on school boards, your “servants” control you. You are a “hostage” in the house in which your “servants” have led you to believe you “own.”

But don't take my word for it. Contact your “servant” and ask for a copy of the legislation they support, the Pennsylvania Real Estate Tax Sale Law. If after reading it you still believe you are being “served and protected,” and that the language in it does not mimic that in the “Communist Manifesto,” then you should thank your creator for giving you your servant.

But if you have comprehended what you read, you will realize you are only two years away from having what you falsely think is your property “confiscated.”

If after reading the legislation you still think you own the house in which you reside, then you lack basic comprehension skills.

Carl F. Miller

North Belle Vernon

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me