ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Reason for income inequality

| Tuesday, Jan. 2, 2018, 9:00 p.m.

Why are those on the left so concerned about income inequality? Do they really believe that a janitor should get paid as much as the CEO? The typist as much as an engineer? The librarian as much as a surgeon or a rocket scientist? A convenience store clerk as much as a successful entrepreneur?

The fact is that in our free society, the sky is the limit and everyone is free to learn and develop skills and knowledge to command a higher salary or to start a business enterprise and make millions.

So why is income inequality such a problem?

The reality is that some people work harder, learn more skills, risk more and are more intelligent than others. That is why there is income inequality. And that is not a negative outcome.

Government cannot bestow a higher salary upon people to raise their quality of life; individuals must earn advancement on their own. And government cannot punish the productive and inventive.

The question we should ask about those at the bottom of the pay scale is not how we can give them more money for what they are now doing but how they can obtain more skills to do work that commands a higher salary.

Dave Majernik


The writer is vice chairman of the Allegheny County Republican Committee.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me